| 2015 | DC | Do We Need Application Profiles? Reflections and Suggestions from Work in DCMI and ISO/IEC. | Liddy Nevile, Eva M. Mndez Rodrguez |
| 2013 | DC | DC Metadata is Alive and Well (and has Influenced a New Standard for Education). | Liddy Nevile |
| 2006 | DC | Using FRBR for the selection and adaptation of accessible resources. | Ayako Morozumi, Mitsuharu Nagamori, Liddy Nevile, Shigeo Sugimoto |
| 2006 | DC | Using the DC Abstract Model to support application profile developers. | Sarah Pulis, Liddy Nevile |
| 2006 | WWW | Personalization and accessibility: integration of library and web approaches. | Ann Chapman, Brian Kelly, Liddy Nevile, Andy Heath |
| 2005 | DC | Anonymous Dublin Core profiles for accessible user relationships with resources and services. | Liddy Nevile |
| 2005 | DC | Was CIMI too early? Dublin Core and Museum Information: metadata as cultural heritage data. | Liddy Nevile, Sophie Lissonnet |
| 2005 | OZCHI | Adaptability and accessibility: a new framework. | Liddy Nevile |
| 2004 | DC | Metadata Generation and Accessibility Auditing. | Liddy Nevile |
| 2004 | DC | The Case for a Person/Agent Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. | Liddy Nevile, Sophie Lissonnet |
| 2003 | HCI | High Quality Scenarios for Raising Web Content Accessibility Awareness. | Liddy Nevile, Oliver K. Burmeister, Charles McCathieNevile |
| 2003 | WWW | Acting Accessibility: Scenario-based consideration of Web content accessibility for development and publishing communities. | Liddy Nevile, Oliver K. Burmeister |
| 2002 | DC | Visualising Interoperability: ARH, Aggregation, Rationalisation and Harmonisation. | Michael Currie, Meigan Geileskey, Liddy Nevile, Richard Woodman |
| 2002 | DC | Why is Accessibility Metadata Proving Difficult? | Liddy Nevile |